翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Histories
・ Histories (Herodotus)
・ Histories (Tacitus)
・ Histories and Addresses of Philosophical Societies
・ Historietter
・ Historiettes, Contes et Fabliaux
・ Historieätarna
・ Historikerstreit
・ Historiographer Royal
・ Historiographer Royal (England)
・ Historiographic metafiction
・ Historiographical Institute of the University of Tokyo
・ Historiography
・ Historiography and Historiophoty
・ Historiography and nationalism
Historiography in the Soviet Union
・ Historiography of Albania
・ Historiography of Alexander the Great
・ Historiography of Argentina
・ Historiography of early Christianity
・ Historiography of early Islam
・ Historiography of Japan
・ Historiography of Juan Manuel de Rosas
・ Historiography of religion
・ Historiography of science
・ Historiography of Scotland
・ Historiography of Switzerland
・ Historiography of the British Empire
・ Historiography of the causes of World War I
・ Historiography of the Cold War


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Historiography in the Soviet Union : ウィキペディア英語版
Historiography in the Soviet Union

Soviet historiography is the methodology of history studies by historians in the Soviet Union (USSR). In the USSR, the study of history was marked by alternating periods of freedom allowed and restrictions imposed by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), and also by the struggle of historians to conduct history by their own estimates (or in their own words, "to guard against bourgeois historiography"). Soviet historiography is itself the subject of modern studies.
==Theoretical approaches==
George M. Enteen identifies two approaches to the study of Soviet historiography. A totalitarian approach associated with the Western analysis of the Soviet Union as a totalitarian society, controlled by the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, this school "thought that signs of dissent merely represented a misreading of commands from above."〔363 For Enteen the other school of writing on Soviet historiography is the social-history school which draws attention to "important initiative from historians at odds with the dominant powers in the field."〔363 Enteen is unable to decide between these different approaches based on current literature.
In Markwick's view there are a number of important post war historiographical movements, which have antecedents in the 1920s and 1930s. Surprisingly these include culturally and psychologically focused history. In the late 1920s Stalinists began limiting individualist approaches to history, culminating in the publication of Stalin and other's ''"Short Course" History of the Soviet Communist Party''.〔 This crystallised the ''piatichlenka'' or five acceptable moments of history in terms of vulgar dialectical materialism: primitive-communism, slavery, feudalism, capitalism and socialism.〔284
While the triumph of Stalinist history was being imposed, different modes of history began to emerge. These included BA Romanov's ''People and Morals in Ancient Rus (1947), a study of ''mentalités'' at the height of the Zhdanovshchina. However, it was not until the 20th Congress of the CPSU that different schools of history emerged from the Stalinist freeze. Firstly, a "new direction" within Leninist materialism emerged, as an effectively loyal opposition to Stalinist dialectical materialism, secondly a social psychology of history emerged through a reading of Leninist psychology, thirdly a "culturological" tendendency emerged.〔284–285

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Historiography in the Soviet Union」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.